Fremont Motorcycle Helmet Laws

While there are no official laws or requirements for wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle in Ohio, not wearing a helmet is dangerous and could impact a personal injury claim. If an individual was injured in a motorcycle accident and was not wearing a helmet, the at-fault party could say that the motorcyclist’s injuries would not have been as severe if they were wearing a helmet. The defense may argue this in order to reduce the amount of damages the injured victim could recover. If you have any questions about Fremont motorcycle helmet laws, reach out to a seasoned attorney. A well-practiced motorcycle accident lawyer could pursue an injury claim on your behalf and help you manage the cost of your injuries and damages.

How Not Wearing a Helmet Could Impact a Claim

Not wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle is not against the law, however, it may be argued that the individual was being irresponsible. Wearing a helmet could show that the person did everything they could to protect themselves and avoid an accident. When someone has been injured in an accident and they were not wearing a helmet, the defense may argue that the person’s injuries would not be as serious if they had been wearing one. While injuries may still occur with helmets, wearing one could protect them from even more serious injuries. Not wearing a helmet could mean life or death. Therefore, even though there are no specific Fremont motorcycle helmet laws, it is advisable to always wear a helmet while riding.

How Helmets Protect Individuals

Wearing a helmet could help protect a person’s head by absorbing some of the impacts in a collision and by keeping the person from being directly hit on the skull. This could help prevent or minimize brain injuries that could otherwise be catastrophic. People are recommended to wear helmets when riding a motorcycle despite Fremont laws since there is little to no doubt that helmets save lives.

The Role of Comparative Negligence

Contributory negligence has been converted into the term comparative negligence. Comparative negligence means that an injured person’s recovery may be reduced by the percent they were responsible if the plaintiff was also partly at fault for the accident. If the person is less than 50 percent at fault for the accident, then they could recover for their damages and injuries. If someone has $100,000 in damages but they are found to be 10 percent responsible for causing their own accidents, then 10 percent or $10,000 would be deducted from the total damages that person could recover. If a person was 50 percent or more responsible, then they are typically barred from recovery. By wearing a helmet, an individual could avoid a greater percentage of the fault being assigned to them.

Call to Learn More About Fremont Motorcycle Helmet Laws

Hundreds of cyclists are killed every year in traffic accidents. In 2015, 818 bicyclists died in crashes involving other motor vehicles. Helmets could save lives and if a person is not wearing while on a bicycle, the chances that a person will be seriously injured or killed may be substantially greater. For more information about the importance of wearing a helmet and Fremont motorcycle helmet laws, seek the services of a knowledgeable attorney.

    Client Review

    Call Boyk Law Office and They Can Help You!

    Title: Call Boyk Law Office and They Can Help You!
    N/A Charles E. Boyk Law Offices, LLC 1500 Timberwolf Drive
    OH 43528
    (419) 241-1395

    Client Description: I wasn't sure if anyone would help me with my case but they explained things every step of the way. They treated me with respect, as if they had known me personally. I'll be happy that all of the bills from the accident will be paid off. Call Boyk Law Office and they can help you!

    Rating: ★★★★★ 5 / 5 stars

    Charles E. Boyk Law Offices, LLC